Skip to content
Monday, October 12, 2026
Alpha Center Bridge

The Venezuelan Crisis Could Now Determine Trump's Political Legacy - and the United States' Position in the World

In the wake of executing a evening of shock and awe in Venezuela, Donald Trump seems to be entering the state-building arena.

In a striking media briefing at his Mar-a-Lago estate on Saturday morning, the president declared that US forces had successfully captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an overnight raid in Caracas.

Trump then said that a delegation including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, collaborating with Venezuelans, would be assuming control of the beleaguered nation.

"We are going to administer the country until such time as we can do a secure, orderly and judicious transition," he said.

What precisely "governing the state" involves is uncertain, but the vow signifies an dramatic change of course for the president, laden with contradictions and formidable challenges.

A leader who ran on opposing "endless conflicts", who sharply criticised past US efforts at overthrowing governments and who promised to implement an "America First" foreign policy is now gambling his administration on successfully reconstructing a South American nation whose economy is in ruins and whose political stability has been eroded by years of authoritarian rule.

Yet, Trump was persistently optimistic.

He claimed his administration has a "unblemished record of winning" – and that this will be no exception. He pledged to recruit American oil firms to rebuild Venezuela's crumbling production infrastructure, supplying funds for the American rebuilding project and benefitting the Venezuelan people.

He left open the possibility of sending American soldiers to Venezuela to progress these efforts. "We do not fear boots on the ground…we had boots on the ground last night," he told reporters.

Trump, a sharp critic of the US invasion of Iraq, will now have to heed the words of one of the American planners of the Iraq War, Secretary of State Colin Powell: "You break it, you bought it."

A Shift in Foreign Policy

The US has reshaped Venezuela's destiny – whether for good or ill.

Trump took office nearly a year ago promising to be a peacemaker, but over the past year he has demonstrated that he is quite prepared to use military force internationally.

In the past week, he ordered air strikes on Syria and Nigeria. In 2025, he targeted atomic sites in Iran, alleged drug-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, insurgent groups in Yemen, armed groups in Somalia and jihadist fighters in Iraq.

Unlike previous actions, which have largely involved missiles and aircraft that reduce the risk of American forces to danger, Trump's Venezuela strike – and his pledges to the fate of that nation – are notably distinct.

His goal, he said during his briefing, is to "restore Venezuela's greatness."

Reactions from Allies and Critics

That twist on Trump's "Make America Great Again" – or Maga - mantra could be difficult for some of Trump's followers to swallow.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a former Trump ally who broke with the president after charging him of deserting his core supporters, was swift to criticize the president's actions on social media.

"Americans' disgust with our own government's perpetual use of force and support of foreign wars is understandable because we are forced to finance it," she stated. "This is what many in Maga thought they voted to end. Boy were we wrong."

Another notable Trump critic, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, contrasted the legal justification for Maduro's arrest – on weapons and drug trafficking charges – with Trump's reasoning that the operation was to retake seized US oil and halt fentanyl production.

Most Republican lawmakers stood by the president, with House Speaker Mike Johnson describing the military action against a "criminal regime" as "firm and justified".

Policy Rationales and Worldwide Consequences

During his press conference, the president argued the Venezuelan operation advanced his "America First" priorities because it guaranteed US regional security and provided a steady source of oil.

He dusted off the Monroe Doctrine – an early 19th Century American foreign policy that asserted the Western Hemisphere should be free from influence by European powers – and rebranded it the "Donroe Doctrine."

The action in Venezuela, Trump said, shows that "US preeminence in the Western Hemisphere will not be challenged again."

The goal of the new US security policy, he said, was to "protect trade, territory and resources that are central to our security interests." He branded the Western Hemisphere as America's "sphere of influence."

Trump's choice to capture Maduro will raise larger concerns in global politics, however, and impact American ties with the world's other major global powers.

The Chinese foreign ministry issued a statement expressing shock and condemning what it said was a irresponsible attack on a sovereign nation.

During the previous administration, the US offered similar condemnations of Russia following its invasion of Ukraine. Now the Trump administration is attempting to broker a ceasefire between those two nations – one that has often appeared to be more favourable to the Russian side.

Don Bacon, a moderate Republican congressman, voiced concern about the message Trump's actions might send.

"My primary worry is now Russia will use this to justify their unlawful and brutal military actions against Ukraine, or China to rationalize an attack of Taiwan."

Political Criticism and Constitutional Questions

Trump's Democratic critics were blunter.

"The United States should not be managing other countries for any reason," said a senator who serves on the Senate Foreign Relations committee. "We should have understood by now not to get involved in endless wars and regime change missions that carry catastrophic results for Americans."

Another senior Democratic lawmaker stated Maduro is a criminal and a dictator with a record of rights violations. But he censured Trump's decision not to consult with congressional leaders prior to initiating the attack.

"The President has the constitutional responsibility to follow the law and protect institutional norms in the United States," he said. "That is what putting America First demands."

Trump, in his remarks, explained that he opted not to inform Congress because he was worried they would "disclose" particulars of the operation prior to the attack.

A Path Forward Shrouded in Doubt

That mission was a success – with zero American casualties and limited damage to US assets. Trump, with his typical confidence, portrayed the operation as a "spectacular assault" and "among the most astonishing, successful and impressive demonstrations of American military might and competency in US history."

Now he is staking his presidency on that victory continuing, as the US says it will assume responsibility for running and rebuilding Venezuela - though what that actually means remains unknown. He and his administration must fortify a nation that has been in turmoil for years while stabilising a region that is sure to be cautious of what Trump's foreign policy has in store for them.

About the author

Sean Schwartz

Elara Vance is a business strategist with over 15 years of experience in corporate innovation and digital transformation, specializing in helping SMEs scale effectively.

Alpha Center Bridge

Type to search articles.